![]() ![]() "It's ALWAYS been policy, thats my point, you claimed actions speak louder, well they have been the most pro active of them all."Įxcept you just provided an article which shows it hasn't always been policy. I have already proven via the above that this is indeed Sony's fault, your blind corporate loyalty doesn't invalidate that proof, sorry. Selective quoting is great, the actual thing I said was I don't have to prove any logic behind why 2K announced cross-play for PS. ![]() "'I don't have to prove anything' So you can just go making stuff up then, but try and claim it's true?" ![]() So unless you have any proof that Epic lied under oath, or that the games developer & publisher are lying, I'm sorry to tell you that they are a way more reliable source than you and your speculation. 2K & Gearbox themselves have said, with regards to Borderlands 3 cross-play, Sony are to blame. This is confirmed by legal statements made under oath in a US federal court.Ģ. Sony/PS are the only platform charging for cross-play. I am saying its Sony's fault based on the following facts:ġ. Speculation with no proof, so invalid argument. "That's even worse then - they were doing it for free and now they've decided to gouge developers and screw consumers under the new leadership." It's ALWAYS been policy, thats my point, you claimed actions speak louder, well they have been the most pro active of them all. "So? Past behavior doesn't mean it's current policy" No it's not, there a far more games that's aren't console cross play then are, so that's not a standard is it? " industry standard today, and is free throughout the industry." It would, if you could prove that Borderlands 3 is a game that falls into "certain circumstance". "occurs under certain circumstances, is that not evidence that Sony charge for cross play?" Until you can grasp that, any counter you make is invalid. If you think that it's possibly Sony's fault, that's fine.īut you're not, you're trying to pass it off speculation as fact. So you can just go making stuff up then, but try and claim it's true? Mr_Writer85 663d ago (Edited 663d ago I don't have to prove anything" Would you be fine if Sony started charging us a $5/mo fee to play cross-play with friends? while Xbox, Switch and PC played for free? I doubt it. Why should developers pay Sony for something that is industry standard today, and is free throughout the industry. "The Verge also says Sweeney confirmed Sony is the only platform holder that requires this compensation for crossplay." Your linked article also proves my point, quoting: If Epic say (under oath in Federal court) that it occurs under certain circumstances, is that not evidence that Sony charge for cross play? "Even Epic say it's under certain circumstances." That's even worse then - they were doing it for free and now they've decided to gouge developers and screw consumers under the new leadership.ĭ) "you and many others still don't have any evidence that Sony charge for cross play." Whether you choose to consider those as MTX or DLC is up to you, we also don't know how Sony interprets those.ī) I don't have to prove anything about what 2K's logic was, the fact remains that regardless of why they announced this, it doesn't negate the fact this is Sony's fault since they are the ones charging, out of line with every other platform.Ĭ) So? Past behavior doesn't mean it's current policy. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |